[141987] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Wed Jun 15 13:04:49 2011
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:04:44 +0200 (CEST)
To: iljitsch@muada.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <B7DD45A7-2859-4200-B49D-FA9CFE1DB034@muada.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> > Ethernet is not designed for huge LANs. If you want that you need
> > to make significant changes - http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mas90/MOOSE/
>
> Hm:
>
> "Our object is to design a communication system which can grow smoothly to accommodate several buildings full of personal computers and the facilities needed for their support."
>
> Ethernet: Distributed Packet Switching for Local Computer Networks
> Robert M. Metcalfe and David R. Boggs
> Communications of the ACM Volume 19 Issue 7, July 1976
So let's change it slightly: Ethernet is not designed for huge
broadcast domains.
How big is huge? To some degree it depends on how broadcast "chatty"
the protocols used are - but there's also the matter of having a
size which makes it possible to troubleshoot. Personally I'd prefer
an upper limit of a few hundred computers.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no