[141989] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jun 15 13:23:59 2011
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:04:44 +0200."
<20110615.190444.78802531.sthaug@nethelp.no>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:21:57 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1308158517_2757P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:04:44 +0200, sthaug@nethelp.no said:
> How big is huge? To some degree it depends on how broadcast "chatty"
> the protocols used are - but there's also the matter of having a
> size which makes it possible to troubleshoot. Personally I'd prefer
> an upper limit of a few hundred computers.
And whatever you do, don't be like one med school and build a flat net
so big that spanning tree won't converge. ;)
--==_Exmh_1308158517_2757P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFN+Oo1cC3lWbTT17ARAudaAJ9NDmit7pWlyKVa1ec6PW9hYufOMQCguxHe
ChvS5fzJmJTnPiU7ViIikWE=
=osGC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1308158517_2757P--
