[141988] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (isabel dias)
Wed Jun 15 13:07:36 2011
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: isabel dias <isabeldias1@yahoo.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <5A7E91C7-96EA-48DC-8420-9A676C12650C@ianai.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
i guess you have a lot of ibgp sessions ..........:-)
bgp finite state model
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finit=
e_state_model.shtml
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=3Dv&q=3Dcache:C5Rq3DV63akJ:citeseerx.ist.ps=
u.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.71.3908%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf+BGP=
+finite+machine&hl=3Den&gl=3Duk&pid=3Dbl&srcid=3DADGEESiwviFqLXrhPybI3RwpVf=
tr_qlgTSZbIzw2b6rlIEAKE8pqIN-D_2BpJIDacMx18AVSBpZtVAYLoPiUcsLbzDOVAcH9whrXJ=
qB8zFm6R7ImuKNoC8dkYD_OHliYNrldoLGde9Hc&sig=3DAHIEtbQa0Typ1WE3rB9ztWZaYFIA8=
t-mag
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4271
--- On Wed, 6/15/11, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
> From: Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
> Subject: Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
> To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 6:54 PM
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James
> Grace wrote:
>=20
> > So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and
> we were considering using private /30's for new
> peerings.=A0 Are there any horrific consequences to
> picking up this practice?
>=20
> "Horrific"?=A0 How about: "Most peers won't bring up a
> session."
>=20
> What happens if the peer is using 1918 space internally?
>=20
> --=20
> TTFN,
> patrick
>=20
>=20
>
