[141986] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (isabel dias)
Wed Jun 15 13:01:17 2011
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: isabel dias <isabeldias1@yahoo.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org, James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4522CE80-08B1-4310-B86F-9CAEA09DCB0E@cs.fiu.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
IPv4? IPv6?
are you planning to do NAT or PAT?
Are you using a bogous ASN 64512 through 65534 to be used for private purpo=
ses?
/30 -> 4 addresses/2 hosts -> you can't do a mesh configuration w/ that sub=
net mask..........
=20
--- On Wed, 6/15/11, James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu> wrote:
> From: James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu>
> Subject: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 6:47 PM
> Hey All,
>=20
> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we
> were considering using private /30's for new peerings.=A0
> Are there any horrific consequences to picking up this
> practice?
>=20
> Cheers,
> James
>=20
>=20
>
