[142031] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Thu Jun 16 19:48:29 2011

To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:31:32 MST."
	<AB27763F-4858-4E70-9825-C3093D8F1416@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:47:30 +1000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


In message <AB27763F-4858-4E70-9825-C3093D8F1416@delong.com>, Owen DeLong write
s:
> 
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> 
> > In a message written on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Jima wrote:
> >> Oh, oops; you did touch upon this.  You might want to let the people 
> >> who've implemented RDNSS in software know that the IETF is working on 
> >> it.  I'm sure that'll be a relief.
> > 
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
> > 5006 I think, which is marked as "experimental", and I thought the
> > IETF still had a working group discussing it. 
> > 
> > That is, I didn't think it was a finalized standard yet.
> > 
> > -- 
> >       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> >        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> 
> Many of the most widely used technologies on the internet do not become
> finalized standards at the IETF level until long after they have been in
> widespread use.
> 
> Owen

But very few are "experimental" and stay that way.  Many stay at
"proposed standard".

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post