[141981] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Wed Jun 15 12:45:42 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110615163906.GA99062@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:45:32 +0200
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 15 jun 2011, at 18:39, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
> 5006 I think, which is marked as "experimental", and I thought the
> IETF still had a working group discussing it.=20
You missed the upgrade to proposed standard:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6106
> That is, I didn't think it was a finalized standard yet.
The IETF rarely gets around to bringing something from proposed standard =
to standard. For instance, HTTP and BGP aren't standards either.=
