[171511] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Sat May 3 13:36:18 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2vbtnkwu9.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 11:36:10 -0600
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> a good number of us use that kinky /10 behind home nats and encourage
> everyone to do so. it was a sick deal and should be treated as such,
> just more 1918.
A good number of folks use other folks IP space in all kinds of
strange and kinky ways too - it's ALL just more 1918, right??? Or
maybe standards exist for a reason. Perhaps enhancing coordination,
cooperation, and *interoperability* are good things... I'll let you
decide, Randy; is it sick to solve problems through community
consensus and standardization, or is it sick to be the one
intentionally getting in the way of those real world solutions?
Cheers,
~Chris
>
> randy
--
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
