[171509] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Sat May 3 13:24:04 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20140503092627.GR13966@besserwisser.org>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 11:23:56 -0600
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:26 AM, M=C3=A5ns Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.or=
g> wrote:
> The fact that you need v4 space to build a MPLS backbone is a very good
> reason to not waste a /10 on CGN crap.
Ah, so you're in the camp that a /10 given to one organization for
their private use would have been better than reserving that /10 for
_everyone_ to use. We'll have to agree to disagree there.
>
> Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure
> could be built without v4 space, demoting v4 to a legacy application
> inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg seems content with status quo.
We can agree on that.
Thanks,
~Chris
>
> --
> M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
> I wish I was a sex-starved manicurist found dead in the Bronx!!
--=20
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
