[171510] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Vitkovsk=FD_Adam?=)
Sat May 3 13:28:13 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Vitkovsk=FD_Adam?= <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
To: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 17:24:24 +0000
In-Reply-To: <7208d8ca20a14690acf8f34a934a68ec@AINET-EX13-S02.ainet.local>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether, anyways It's interesti=
ng to see how everybody tends to separate the IPv4 and IPv6 AFs onto a diff=
erent TCP sessions and still run the plethora of other AFs on the common v4=
TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the big folks, who can afford runn=
ing separate control-plane and edge infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv=
6 AF being the first ran separately.=20
adam
