[171495] in North American Network Operators' Group
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Fri May 2 17:58:50 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 15:58:42 -0600
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi Mans,
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, M=C3=A5ns Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.or=
g>wrote:
> This is a field where v4 next-hops are essential to make things
> work. <rant>In that context, allocating 100.64.0.0/10 to CGN was
> especially un-clever... </rant>
>
Would you expound a bit on what you mean here? I don't quite follow but I
am very interested to understand the issue.
Thanks!
~Chris
--=20
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
