[171512] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sat May 3 14:23:54 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 20:23:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Vitkovsk=FD_Adam?= <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
In-Reply-To: <61DC6BC4ABA10E4489D4A73EBABAC18B011E9A3F@EX01.swan.local>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sat, 3 May 2014, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
> Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether, anyways It's
> interesting to see how everybody tends to separate the IPv4 and IPv6 AFs
> onto a different TCP sessions and still run the plethora of other AFs on
> the common v4 TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the big folks, who
> can afford running separate control-plane and edge infrastructure for
> some of the AFs, IPv6 AF being the first ran separately.
I know lots of people who run vpnv4 separately from ipv4 and ipv6 (so they
have 3 sessions). The ones I talked to intends to run vpnv6 separately as
well.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
