[97013] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Wed May 30 16:14:53 2007
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D3C504C4-6656-4511-B812-B1363DD6EB39@ianai.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones".
> Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for
> instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something. Which is not
> particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone".
Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data?
Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers?
-Don
