[97010] in North American Network Operators' Group
dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Wed May 30 15:49:05 2007
In-Reply-To: <465DD310.1040902@psg.com>
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:48:01 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On May 30, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> This is a grand game of chicken. The ISPs are refusing to move
>> first due to
>> lack of content
>
> pure bs. most significant backbones are dual stack. you are the
> chicken, claiming the sky is falling.
I guess we have different definitions for "most significant
backbones". Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running
_somewhere_, say, for instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or
something. Which is not particularly useful if we are talking about
a "significant backbone".
That said, I certainly don't think content is doing well either. Nor
am I trying to say which is at fault. In fact, not even sure I care
who is at fault, if fault can even be apportioned.
--
TTFN,
patrick
P.S. Don't suppose people could change the subject when, well, the
subject changes?
