[97014] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David W. Hankins)
Wed May 30 16:18:13 2007
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:09:53 -0700
From: "David W. Hankins" <David_Hankins@isc.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AD4796C3-AF49-4C1E-B726-610FE0341173@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:10:02PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> If you like DHCP, fine, run DHCP. But I don't like it, so please =20
> don't force _me_ to run it.
OK, I can (and do) live with that.
I tend to prefer technical reasons to choose a technology (and in
so doing, hope to avoid "throwing spaghetti at the wall"), but if
you'd rather base your decisions on what you like (or not), you have
every right to do so.
In my opinion there are a bulk of technical merits that place DHCPv6
ahead of RTadv. I don't like either protocol, but they're what we've
got.
--=20
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGXdoRcXeLeWu2vmoRAlF0AJ9C1g6f44E1EyTLlkDEsHZoLnoACACaA8+l
Tw68x9XZmYg0nVO5RIDoyrI=
=uz53
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KuLpqunXa7jZSBt+--
