[97021] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
Wed May 30 17:14:23 2007
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:09:25 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070530160145.B20281@calis.blacksun.org>
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I've been trying to collect the info about services (including ISPs and
transit providers) and products (software and hardware) that "say" they
offer IPv6 (still in the phase of verifying one by one, but almost done !).
Is still not complete, but I think provides a good picture.
http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/
Just a few examples: You can type ISP in the free search box, or TLD, or
load balancer.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
> Responder a: <owner-nanog@merit.edu>
> Fecha: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
> Para: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
> CC: <nanog@nanog.org>
> Asunto: Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
>
>
>> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones".
>> Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for
>> instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something. Which is not
>> particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone".
> Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data?
>
> Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers?
>
> -Don
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
