[172517] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jean-Francois.Dube@videotron.com)
Fri Jun 20 10:51:01 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <907f350843684b90943fca3032d0fbe5@EX2013N1.chatham.teksavvy.ca>
To: gabe@teksavvy.ca
From: Jean-Francois.Dube@videotron.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:50:51 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
There are obviously layer 8-9-10 issues to deal with as well before native =
IPv6 can be deployed.
Being a IP NOC grunt, I keep my focus on layer 1-7.
JF
Jean-Fran=E7ois Dub=E9
Technicien, Op=E9rations R=E9seau IP
Ing=E9nierie Exploitation des R=E9seaux
Vid=E9otron
"NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> a =E9crit sur 2014-06-20 10:22:17 :
> De : Gabriel Blanchard <gabe@teksavvy.ca>
> A : "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>,=20
> Date : 2014-06-20 10:24
> Objet : RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
> Envoy=E9 par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>
>=20
> 6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of=20
> offering IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered=20
> where possible.
>=20
> We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in=20
> basis, we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable=20
> since we still depend on a certain incumbent...
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Francois.Dube@videotron.com
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM
> To: lists@sadiqs.com
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org; NANOG
> Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
>=20
> Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential=20
> customers, if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212)
>=20
> (But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.)
>=20
> JF
>=20
> Jean-Fran=E7ois Dub=E9
> Technicien, Op=E9rations R=E9seau IP
> Ing=E9nierie Exploitation des R=E9seaux
> Vid=E9otron
>=20
> "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> a =E9crit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 :
>=20
> > De : Sadiq Saif <lists@sadiqs.com>
> > A : nanog@nanog.org,
> > Date : 2014-06-19 12:43
> > Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoy=E9=
=20
> > par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>
> >=20
> > On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
> > > Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
> >=20
> > Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of=20
> > residential IPv6 connectivity?
> >=20
> > Is there any progress being made on this front?
> >=20
> > --
> > Sadiq Saif
