[172511] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
Fri Jun 20 06:48:31 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:48:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ottix.net>
To: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJL_ZMPmzdYyYSRcwfw2V6CwS8s3ZJTSxz0C46=-K3Q+E_ggVA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, jim deleskie wrote:
> Those all sounds like legit business questions.
Yup. On the otherhand at the other end of the customer spectrum:
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/it-ti/ipv6/ipv6tb-eng.asp
> -jim
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Sadiq Saif wrote:
>
> On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
> Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
>
>
> Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of
> residential IPv6 connectivity?
>
> Is there any progress being made on this front?
>
>
> Teksavvy does it (tunnel I believe) if you ask.
>
> Otherwise it's the usual:
>
> - 'why do we need this?';
> - 'It costs money to upgrade for something low-demand';
> - 'What's the market?';
> - 'I don't have time';
> - 'Aw gee do I have to??'
>
> wfms
>
>
>
>
wfms
