[172516] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gabriel Blanchard)
Fri Jun 20 10:22:25 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Gabriel Blanchard <gabe@teksavvy.ca>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:22:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <OF6FEBD146.161EE1B3-ON85257CFD.004D6BAB-85257CFD.004E0D1A@videotron.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of offering=
 IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered where possible.

We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in basis, =
we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable since we still=
 depend on a certain incumbent...

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois.Dub=
e@videotron.com
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM
To: lists@sadiqs.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; NANOG
Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)

Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential customers, =
if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212)

(But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.)

JF

Jean-Fran=E7ois Dub=E9
Technicien, Op=E9rations R=E9seau IP
Ing=E9nierie Exploitation des R=E9seaux
Vid=E9otron

"NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> a =E9crit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 :

> De : Sadiq Saif <lists@sadiqs.com>
> A : nanog@nanog.org,
> Date : 2014-06-19 12:43
> Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoy=E9=20
> par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>
>=20
> On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
> > Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
>=20
> Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of=20
> residential IPv6 connectivity?
>=20
> Is there any progress being made on this front?
>=20
> --
> Sadiq Saif

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post