[171516] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Sat May 3 16:55:57 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 22:55:47 +0200
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405032022470.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Reply-To: mh@xalto.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Le 03/05/2014 20:23, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Sat, 3 May 2014, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
>
>> Sure it's a different transport protocol altogether, anyways It's
>> interesting to see how everybody tends to separate the IPv4 and IPv6
>> AFs onto a different TCP sessions and still run the plethora of other
>> AFs on the common v4 TCP session, maybe apart from couple of the big
>> folks, who can afford running separate control-plane and edge
>> infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv6 AF being the first ran
>> separately.
>
> I know lots of people who run vpnv4 separately from ipv4 and ipv6 (so
> they have 3 sessions). The ones I talked to intends to run vpnv6
> separately as well.
>
Voilà ! Question is rather ``why not''?... once you decide to support
services...
mh
