[162893] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (goemon@anime.net)
Mon May 6 14:30:20 2013
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: goemon@anime.net
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <scx1fbmgawd4h0i9poeniuuk.1367857770004@email.android.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
if anyone wondered why abuse goes unchecked, wonder no longer.
-Dan
On Mon, 6 May 2013, Warren Bailey wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
> Date: 05/06/2013 9:29 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
> Cc: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>,Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>,Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>,NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and AS57954 (in ukraine)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu<mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 May 2013 15:27:35 -0000, Warren Bailey said:
>> Illegal or undesired?
>
> This sort of stuff comes in two flavors: "typo" and "intentionally done
> in furtherance of criminal activities".
>
> The fact that an AS number and matching IP range are involved tends to say it's
> not a typo.
>
>
> maybe warren's question is better stated: "Please point to relevant legal code in the jurisdiction(s) which are relevant." (if you feel this is 'illegal', showing where in the relevant code(s) where this would be classified as such would help)
>
> -chris
>
>
>
