[162888] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Mon May 6 11:28:12 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>, 'Nick Hilliard'
<nick@foobar.org>, 'Christopher Morrow' <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:27:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <040901ce4a2b$c0692b10$413b8130$@swan.sk>
Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Illegal or undesired?
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
Date: 05/06/2013 12:33 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: 'Nick Hilliard' <nick@foobar.org>,'Christopher Morrow' <morrowc.lists@g=
mail.com>
Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: RE: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 =
and AS57954 (in ukraine)
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 8:21 PM
> From a deployment point of view, there's a pretty big gap between poking
around with rpki and actually dropping prefixes on your routers. I don't
see that the rpki data will be good enough for the latter any time soon, bu=
t
maybe one day.
Well you can always jus lower the preference for a particular prefix based
on the roa state or roa missing.
Than it is solely up to your customers whether they bother to register thei=
r
prefixes to avoid hijacks or not, as you'll be ready on your part.
adam
