[162892] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Mon May 6 12:31:45 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Valdis Kletnieks
<Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 16:29:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaat1RZRm8urGaqPtMUJV=50UdQQUS5aiTndGmVjVTmHQw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
+1
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: 05/06/2013 9:29 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>,Adam Vitkovsky <=
adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>,Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>,NANOG <nanog@nanog.=
org>
Subject: Re: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 =
and AS57954 (in ukraine)
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu<mailto:Valdis.Kle=
tnieks@vt.edu>> wrote:
On Mon, 06 May 2013 15:27:35 -0000, Warren Bailey said:
> Illegal or undesired?
This sort of stuff comes in two flavors: "typo" and "intentionally done
in furtherance of criminal activities".
The fact that an AS number and matching IP range are involved tends to say =
it's
not a typo.
maybe warren's question is better stated: "Please point to relevant legal c=
ode in the jurisdiction(s) which are relevant." (if you feel this is 'illeg=
al', showing where in the relevant code(s) where this would be classified a=
s such would help)
-chris
