[141985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Wed Jun 15 12:59:00 2011
In-Reply-To: <4522CE80-08B1-4310-B86F-9CAEA09DCB0E@cs.fiu.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:56:52 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering =
using private /30's for new peerings. =A0Are there any horrific consequence=
s to picking up this practice?
>
You can reclaim space by switching your peerings to /31s where possible.
If you go down the private space route, make sure you and your peers
know about "next hop self"
Cameron
