[131161] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Unique_local_addres?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Wed Oct 20 23:29:33 2010
To: matthew@matthew.at
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:47:23 PDT."
<4CBFA9BB.9030100@matthew.at>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:29:11 +1100
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <4CBFA9BB.9030100@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
> ULA + PA can have the same problems, especially if your ULA is
> inter-organization ULA, which was one of the cases under discussion.
Which still isn't a problem. Presumably you want your inter-organization
traffic to use ULA addresses to talk to each other so you setup the
address selection rules to do just that. That requires new rules
being distributed to all nodes that need to talk to the other site.
Presumable DHCPv6 could do this. If there isn't yet a DHCP option
to request address selection rules we need to define one. Use a
VPN between the organisations so you fate share. If you have a
private interconnect then the VPN becomes the backup.
> Matthew Kaufman
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
