[131158] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Unique_local_addres?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Wed Oct 20 22:50:36 2010
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:50:06 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101021125730.3bb576b4@opy.nosense.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: matthew@matthew.at
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/20/2010 7:27 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> * Stream Control Transport Protocol, first spec'd in 2000 (couldn't
> be deployed widely in IPv4 because of NATs)
"because of NATs" s/b "because certain parties refused to acknowledge
that encapsulation of SCTP in UDP would have operational advantages
sufficient to outweigh the disadvantages".
SCTP only gets you 90% of the way there, but it is a lot closer than
today's TCP is.
Matthew Kaufman
