[131162] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?UTF-8?B?4oCU?= Unique local addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Wed Oct 20 23:32:16 2010
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:01:59 +1030
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101021032911.C735F5F076F@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:29:11 +1100
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>
> In message <4CBFA9BB.9030100@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
> > ULA + PA can have the same problems, especially if your ULA is
> > inter-organization ULA, which was one of the cases under discussion.
>
> Which still isn't a problem. Presumably you want your inter-organization
> traffic to use ULA addresses to talk to each other so you setup the
> address selection rules to do just that. That requires new rules
> being distributed to all nodes that need to talk to the other site.
> Presumable DHCPv6 could do this. If there isn't yet a DHCP option
> to request address selection rules we need to define one.
One is being defined -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujisaki-6man-addr-select-opt/
> Use a
> VPN between the organisations so you fate share. If you have a
> private interconnect then the VPN becomes the backup.
>
> > Matthew Kaufman
> >
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
