[131148] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Unique_local_addres?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Wed Oct 20 21:46:51 2010
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:46:34 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101021115021.2dc77ce6@opy.nosense.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: matthew@matthew.at
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/20/2010 6:20 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> To make it clear, as it seems to be quite misunderstood, you'd have
> both ULA and global addressing in your network.
Right. Just like to multihome with IPv6 you would have both PA addresses
from provider #1 and PA addresses from provider #2 in your network.
Only nobody wants to do that either.
Matthew Kaufman
