[126978] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Jun 9 11:05:50 2010
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:05:27 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimW-dA9fPMOh8oVYp00FwCm2pf1NYbOqtUQKP_Z@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/9/2010 07:39, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> 1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
>
> Not sure, ISPs role is just to move packets from A to B, you need to
> clearly define what constitutes abuse and how much of it is considered
> a crime.
>
> If I call your home every five minutes to harass you over the phone is
> AT&T responsible ?
How does the question change with a "regulator" telling them they are?
And does it matter if I refuse all calls from ATT because they don't?
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
