[126936] in North American Network Operators' Group
ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Wed Jun 9 02:14:34 2010
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:14:10 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
boil this down to a couple of issues:
1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
1a. If so, how?
2. Should hosting providers also be held responsible for customers who
abuse their services in a criminal manner?
2.a If so, how?
I think anyone in their right mind would agree that if a provider see
criminal activity, they should take action, no?
If that also holds true, then why doesn't it happen?
Providers in the U.S. are the worst offenders of hosting/accommodating
criminal activities by Eastern European criminals. Period.
$.02,
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wj8DBQFMDzEsq1pz9mNUZTMRAofEAKDsKxNL+5GT0ztuuqq4LpK/i3TFmACeJ4mc
wfZppwxJYkvW1vS6cacuuX0=
=Xs0E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
