[126990] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Jun 9 12:37:01 2010
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:36:31 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <1913AEBB-BEF7-42A9-87BB-D3CFC332C958@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/9/2010 10:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> What happened to the acronyms "AUP" and "TOS"?
>>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that. I'm talking about an ISPs liability to
> third party victims, not to their customers.
"Acceptable Use Policy" and "Terms of Service"
>
> AUP/TOS are between the ISP and their customer.
Very good. Does that provide an answer to the earlier question about
"what is a provider to do?" when a customer misbehaves? Does that
provide a method for assigning liability?
I am not a lawyer, but it doesn't seem a stretch to me to include, in
this context, traffic from peers and transit providers.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
