[120642] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Dec 29 17:48:08 2009
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:47:22 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <75cb24520912291429v5008180bx65b45d13e275b397@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>> None of us knows precisely what we're going to absolutely require, or
>>> merely want/prefer, tomorrow or the next day, much less a year or two
>>> from now. Unless, of course, we choose to optimize (constrain)
>>> functionality so tightly around what we want/need today that the
>>> prospect of getting anything different is effectively eliminated.
>>
>> this is the telco solution to the nasty disruptive technologies spawned
>> by the internet
>
> I could be mistaken, but I think Tom's point was "we could give people
> the ebony black bell phone, that'd really suck for us as a
> business/community."
sorry, i should have been more clear that i was agreeing with tom.
replies might not be assumed to be in opposition.
randy
