[120641] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Dec 29 17:30:28 2009
In-Reply-To: <m2bphhju9e.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:29:50 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> None of us knows precisely what we're going to absolutely require, or
>> merely want/prefer, tomorrow or the next day, much less a year or two
>> from now. Unless, of course, we choose to optimize (constrain)
>> functionality so tightly around what we want/need today that the
>> prospect of getting anything different is effectively eliminated.
>
> this is the telco solution to the nasty disruptive technologies spawned
> by the internet
I could be mistaken, but I think Tom's point was "we could give people
the ebony black bell phone, that'd really suck for us as a
business/community."
-chris
