[120654] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Wed Dec 30 09:56:29 2009
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:55:57 -0500
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <08EF11E7-090F-494B-8083-52D30D8DD9E5@puck.nether.net>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:19:32PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
[snip]
> Apparently I forgot the <rant> tag, but really, if you have sane
> CoPP policies, you are mostly protected. If the vendor does not
> provide this capability, please STOP BUYING THEIR CRAP.
Another fine example of broken fate-sharing when management plane
(executives with purse strings) is strictly segmented from control
plane (engineers and operators).
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
