[53] in APO News

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Standing Policy Proposal

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (EDK)
Tue Jul 21 00:39:27 1992

From: EDK.LASPAU@mhsgw.harvard.edu (EDK)
To: APO-NEWS@Athena.MIT.EDU (-)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 92 00:10


I think people are getting a little too hung up on the money aspects of 
this and not enough is being said about the committment aspect.  It is 
important for PCs to know how many people to expect on a project.  If it 
takes a policy make it clearer what people are committing to by putting 
their name down on a list with a symbol after it so be it.  If custom is 
good enough, that's okay too -- however, the impression I'm getting is that 
right now custom isn't good enough (if it was, would this have even been 
proposed?  Crystal?).  

If the signup sheet reflects anything vaguely resembling reality then the 
whole thing is a non-issue.

At some point with enough time for the PC to contact the group the project 
is for, all the wishy-washy answers on the project signup need to be 
defined so that the PC tell that group how many workers to expect.  (This 
step can vary in importance depending on the group and the nature of the 
project.)  The calendar and the work week dictate that this finalization 
has to occur on Thursday night.

When someone says they are going on a project, they are making a promise to 
the PC to be there.  On the basis of those promises from individual 
brothers, the PC promises that the chapter will do a certain amount of 
work. When individuals fail to honor their promise to attend project, it 
puts them in a bad light and casts doubts on what their word is worth in 
other contexts, it gives the chapter a reputation for not following through 
on the commitments it makes, and by the way it happens to cost the chapter 
some money on food.

I think I'll stop rambling now.  I'm not sure I'm thinking coherently any 
longer.

Y.I.B.
Ellen

P.S.  If you really want to do something about the chapter losses on food, 
you might want to consider getting rid of the policy that fixes meal prices 
(is that for all projects or only chapterweekends anyway) and let them 
float with the actual cost of the meals.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post