[3942] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Fortran 77 and 90
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Mon Nov 11 18:15:13 1996
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: teg@stud.imf.unit.no
From: teg@stud.imf.unit.no (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date: 11 Nov 1996 23:42:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: "Hal L. DeVore Jr."'s message of Mon, 11 Nov 1996 12:55:10 -0600
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
"Hal L. DeVore Jr." <hdevore@crow.bmc.com> writes:
> What's wrong with writing a makefile that uses f2c followed by compiling the
> resulting C code?
You could use fort77 which does this automatically.
But it is much slower, the code is slower and the combination is not
good enough to compile e.g. BLAS and LAPACK out of the box.
> Consider the C code another form of object code.
Consider it an unnecessary and perfomance-degrading medium stage.
--
Microsoft GIGO 7.0 : Garbage In, Gospel Out
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
