[29918] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 1161 Volume: 11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Thu Jan 3 06:25:00 2008
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:24:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Thu, 3 Jan 2008 Volume: 11 Number: 1161
Today's topics:
M'I`5 Per secution , h ow an d w hy di d it start ? vivmv@gmail.com
M,I-5 Persecutio n , abuse in set- up situa tions and imivem@gmail.com
M,I-5,Persecu tion w ho kn ows abou t it? vivfvfifi@gmail.com
M,I.5 Persecutio n , MI 5 Ha ve Systematicall y Destroy miefemim@hotmail.com
M,I`5'P ersecution ' Thre e Ye ars of MI 5 Persecutio n fifmvimi@lycos.com
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: vivmv@gmail.com
Subject: M'I`5 Per secution , h ow an d w hy di d it start ?
Message-Id: <nm0800011014535310@4ax.com>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= how and why. did it start? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The harassment didn't. start by itself, so someone must have been there at
the outset to give it a firm. push and set the "animals" after me. It looks
as if I was set up in June 1990,. and the timing indicates someone from
university was. responsible.
>One thing which has been missing from. this discussion is this simple
>prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his. admitted
>mental condition, there really is. a campaign against him organised by
>now-influential ex-students. of his university.
In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out. a letter from someone
who had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out. his
welcome with random precision" (from the Pink. Floyd song). Freeman went on
to say. to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote there". The
indication is strongly. that people I had parted from soon before nursed a
grudge against me and. were trying to cause trouble for me.
The. suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the letter to other people,
and things. could have snowballed from there. Right from the start the real
source (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves. as the
origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs,. believe that they were the
originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5. and we have a
campaign against. this bloke" then people might not go along with it; but if
you say, "everyone else is getting at. this bloke because he 'deserves' it"
then people. will join in with fewer qualms.
>Why would "they". wish to assassinate your character?
It's the classic case of hitting. a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why
would the security. services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more
than six years of manpower to try. to kill a British citizen? Because they
are motivated by people. who knew me at university and feel personal
animosity; because they knew me to. be emotionally weak, and it is in the
nature of bullies to prey on those. known to be weak; and because they can
rely on the complicity of the. establishment, which the security services
manipulate and derive funding from. This is England's biggest. humiliation
today, and the British security services are intent. on preventing their
humiliation becoming reality by continuing their campaign. of attempted
murder to. suppress the truth from becoming public.
10063
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: imivem@gmail.com
Subject: M,I-5 Persecutio n , abuse in set- up situa tions and in pub lic
Message-Id: <qp0800011437267483@4ax.com>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= abuse. in set-up situations and in public -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Strangers in the street have recognized me. on sight many times, and shown
awareness of the current thread of. abuse. To give you one example, in 1992
I was seriously ill, and. a manager at work somewhat humorously said that
"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days. later, I attended
for the first. time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my way out
was. accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis
on the word "fare". He. repeated the word several times in this different
context; that they should have paid. my "fare", each time emphasizing the
word.
For two and a half years from. the time their harassment started until
November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that. I
was not ill of my own action. or fault, but through the stress caused by
harassment, and that a lessening of. the illness would have to be consequent
to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a. cessation of
harassment. I. also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes
about mental illness, if I. were to seek treatment then the abusers would
think that they had "won" and. been proved "right". Remember, the constant
theme of any persecution is,. "we must destroy you because you're X",
whether X is a racial or. other attribute. In this case the X was "we
persecute. you because you have brain disease". The similarity of this logic
to Nazi attitudes to the mentally. ill is striking.
The same manager who'd said "it wasn't fair" asked me in. winter 1992 why I
didn't seek help from. a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would
think they had won" if I sought treatment? That. was something I'd never
said at work.... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such
things over a period. of months proves conclusively that people in the
company knew what was. going on, and in quite a lot of detail.
Usually harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of "paying. your
fare". Most people's imagination does not. go beyond moronic parroting of
the current term of denigration. That is not surprising. given the average
level of the abusers;. if they do not have the intelligence to distinguish
wrong from. right then neither will they have the capacity for anything
other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term calculated to. fit
into. their minds.
The first incidents of verbal assault in public were in. again in the summer
of. 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom with time. In July
1990 the first public incident occurred. on a tube train on the Northern
line. Two men. and their girlfriends recognised me; the women sprang to my
defence, saying "He looks. perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill". Their
boyfriends. of course knew better, and followed the party line; one of them
made reference to an "operation", apparently to. work at the tube station
but implicitly to a visit. that I had made to hospital a couple of weeks
previously.
In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting on a. tube train
at Gloucester Road I was followed by a group. of four youths, who started a
chant of abuse. That they were. targeting me was confirmed by other people
in the carriage, one. of whom asked the other "who are they going on at, is
it the bloke who just got on?" to which the second replied. "yes, I think
so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every other. instance the abusers are
enabled in their cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused;. any
confrontation would result. in my being beaten up, followed by a complaint
to the police that "he attacked us", and. of course he's ill, so he must
have been imagining that we were getting at him.. Shitty, aren't they?
But the shittiness of the. four youths on the tube train is as nothing
compared to the episode on the National Express coach to Dover. in the
summer of 1992. While going. on holiday to the Continent I was verbally set
upon by a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind.. The boy did the
talking,. his female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling
noise. He spoke loudly to ensure other. people on the coach heard, always
about "they" and "this. bloke" but never naming either the abusers or the
person he was talking about.. He said "they" had "found somebody from his
school, and. he was always really stressed at school". They must have dug
deep to find. enemies there; perhaps someone who dropped out of school,
someone who didn't do too well later, who was jealous. and keen to get their
own back? The boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast for. only one
night and they got him". By. a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a
B&B in Oxford a week previously, which. had been booked from work; other
things lead me to the conclusion that the company's offices were bugged. for
most of the 2 1/2. years that I was there, so "they" would have known a room
in the B&B had been booked. (But I'll bet "they". didn't tell the company's
managers. their offices were bugged, did they?).
After a few minutes of this I went back to. where they were sitting and
asked. where they were travelling. The boy named a village in France, and
the girl's giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated. to her brain
cell what the purpose of the boy's. abuse was.
This and. other set-up situations are obviously calculated to provoke a
direct confrontation which would bring in the police, with. the abusers
claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again. in 1992, outside the
house where I was living in Oxford I was physically. attacked by someone -
not punched, just grabbed by the coat,. with some verbals thrown in for good
measure. That was something the. people at work shouldn't have known
about... but soon after a. couple of people were talking right in front of
me about, "I heard he was attacked". The UK police have. a responsibility
for preventing assault occurring, but they do not seem to take any. interest
in. meeting that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that harassment
does not come within their remit unless it involves. physical assault, and
they will only become involved once that. happens. That is of course quite
the wrong attitude for them to. take, but as I now understand, the police
investigate. only the crime they wish to investigate; if they do not take
your complaints seriously then there is nothing you can do. to make them
take. action.
2773
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:41:56 +0000 (UTC)
From: vivfvfifi@gmail.com
Subject: M,I-5,Persecu tion w ho kn ows abou t it?
Message-Id: <xs0800011141559750@4ax.com>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= who knows about it?. =-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and. among the
general. public. Despite an absence of its target from the UK for more than
two years, the echoes of paranoia can still. be heard loud and clear from
across the water. When it started in 1990, the only. people who knew were
those in BBC television who were. spying on my home, and a few radio
broadcasters. There were a few cases of public harassment, but. very little
compared to the situation that developed a couple of years. later.
The list today includes BBC. TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis,
Michael Buerk, Nicholas. Witchell), people from radio stations such as
Chris Tarrant of Capital and. Radio 1 DJs, people in the print media, but
also many. people in the general public. All united in a conspiracy which
breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding. harassment, and all
completely uncaring for any semblance. of decency or elementary respect
for. individual rights.
The British police (obviously) do know the nature of the. harassment and in
all probability the identity of those behind. it. Some time ago I made a
complaint to my local police station in London, without positive. result.
The UK police are failing in their. duty to see the law enforced in not
checking the. abuse.
2773
------------------------------
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:38:33 GMT
From: miefemim@hotmail.com
Subject: M,I.5 Persecutio n , MI 5 Ha ve Systematicall y Destroy ed My L ife
Message-Id: <xi0711310938307128@4ax.com>
MI5 Have Systematically Destroyed My. Life
This is getting depressing. From the feedback Ive received,. the recipients
of these faxes are tired of hearing my. complaints, and in truth I am tired
of sending them. The reason I havent yet ceased sending. faxes is because I
cannot think of any other effective means of replying to MI5s. actions
against me, and I feel I have to do something to try. to defend
myself. Three/four years ago I got the MI5. harassment out of my system by
posting. about it on Internet newsgroups, and for a few months this tactic
was quite effective - I received (and indeed still do. today) support from
newsgroup regulars, and felt. I could make my voice heard and break the MI5
monopoly on. access to the British media. But that was years ago, and today
nobody gives a tinkers cuss about my. internet posts - so I have sought to
escalate matters. by communicating directly with the politicians who
allegedly say how this country. is supposed to be run.
Of course, its quite expensive to keep up a campaign of. fax messages for
many weeks. Each set of faxes. takes approx 50 hours to send over the
weekend, and costs perhaps 35. My. phone bill for the last quarter was
350. These figures are naturally. insignificant compared to what MI5 have
been spending against me over a similar period. It also takes a lot. of
time and energy. to create a new article every week, and try and find new
and fresh. aspects and viewpoints on MI5s persecution of me. I am beginning
to run out of both new topics. and energy to write these articles.
So I. have a suggestion to put before the MI5 persecutors who have been
wrecking my life since. 1990. In a few days time I will be going on holiday
to Poland. and Germany, for a couple of weeks. Previously, almost every
time I have travelled by plane, or. gone anywhere on holiday, the MI5
"wreckers" have been. most assiduous in destroying these trips. My
suggestion is; if MI5 leave me alone on this next trip,. I will cease
transmitting these articles. If, however, there are any. clear instances of
harassment (and I am very capable of. recognising MI5 harassment when I see
it), then I will. make public these instances and publish any recordings I
may make of them, and, unwillingly and unhappily, continue. the articles.
Read. about the MI5 Persecution on the Web
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my. elected representative, as ever
refuses to. help.
MI5 Refuse to Allow me to have a Normal. Life
Its kind. of difficult to contemplate having a normal existence when you
know your. entire house is bugged from top to bottom, for audio and, very
unpleasantly, video; when. your employment is systematically destroyed,
over and over again; when every time you leave the country. your travel is
disrupted. by MI5 plants on the plane yelling abuse at you..... you get the
idea. I would like to have some semblance of. a normal life, like my Polish
and English friends do. But MI5 have made. this impossible, and they have
leached massive resources from. the taxpayer to institute a life not worthy
of the. name on me.
A few years ago MI5 were very. open about their aims in persecuting
me. They were shouting "suicide" at me, both in Canada where. I lived at
the. time, and during my occasional visits to London. You cant get much
clearer than that. There have been. instances as recently as a few weeks
ago of this intention being voiced by. their side; on 15 April 1999, a
woman at the next ticket. counter at the Royal Festival Hall said;
"it would kill it, you know, it would just be overkill... they. can't stop
can. they"
meaning that "they" were trying to "kill. it" i.e. me and they "cant
stop". The audio file is. at;
I. wonder why they "cant stop". Nobody (who doesnt know already) believes
my claims - so what difference would it make, if. they were to
"stop" persecuting me? Perhaps what this persons. remarks indicates, is the
depth of the obsession MI5 have with this. case. They have chosen at random
a person from the general population, and done their. worst to ruin my
life. What is wrong with these people, that they persecute. a national of
the country whose citizens they are supposed. to protect?
No Chance. of a Harassment-Free Job
Since the harassment started in 1990. I have had three jobs, the first near
Guildford, the second in Oxford, and the. third overseas in Canada. All
three jobs have. been systematically destroyed by MI5. It is so ironic that
MI5 employs a team. of agents, each well compensated for their efforts, to
persecute just one person paid a mere. fraction of what they get for their
"work". In fact, it is. a joke that MI5 is allocated resources for this
sort of effort. If this area of. government were run along commercial lines
then MI5 would be very rapidly closed down, they produce nothing of. any
value, instead spending their time obsessed with. the bugging and
surveillance of their former employees like. Shayler, dangerous subversives
like Straw and Mandelson, and "threats to. national security" like yours
truly.
Applying for my first post university. job
When I was applying for my first post-university job. in the closing months
of 1990, I found at two or three job interviews that MI5 had got. there
ahead of me. Interviewers knew what words. to repeat from what had been
said at my home recently; MI5 had supplied them with words to hurt me,. and
the "British secret police" were. trying to wreck my job search and
discourage me from joining the. world of work. This and the continuing
harassment in the. media and by the public meant that the search for a job
took very much longer. than it would ordinarily be expected to take for a
person with. my qualifications.
With my first job near Guildford. came the knowledge that MI5 were doing
everything possible to make me lose the job. Despite their efforts. I
managed to stay in. work for ten unhappy months, during which they made
very. clear to me that they were bugging my workplace, my accomodation in
Woking,. my car, my home..... and they also made clear that they had "got
to" my employer. in Guildford.
Employment with. Oxford
I was able. to find a new job, with Oxford Computer Training Services (now
ARIS/Oxford), quite quickly. But. it became very clear, very quickly, that
MI5 were treating this job the same as the first; they tried to. get the
other employees and. in particular the managers to attack me. It was
plainly MI5s intention that I be sacked. fro this job. But I was not
sacked; instead,. after almost a year of abuse from OCTS managers, I was
forced to seek medical. help, and had to take two months off for medical
leave. OCTS MD Hugh Simpson-Wells was motivated in keeping me on by. the
fear that if. he sacked me, then I would take him to court for the
treatment OCTS managers had meted out to me during. 1992.
Emigration. to Canada
When I. emigrated to Canada in 1994, I did think that perhaps MI5 would
leave me alone, given that I had made the effort to leave. the UK and try
to find. a new life overseas. I could not see any reason why they would
continue to harass me over in Canada.. But clearly the MI5 agents had their
salaries to think about,. since continue to harass me they most certainly
did,. at my home in Ottawa, and by getting fellow employees to speak
against me, as had. happened with previous jobs in the UK.
MI5 are. denying me a future in work
Former Chief Constable of. Devon and Cornwall John Alderson had this to say
regarding. MI5's activities;
"MI5 is not under the same. restraints as the police. They infiltrate
organisations, people's. jobs and lives. They operate almost like a
cancer."
Currently I am on disability, and I can see that. MI5 are denying me a
future. in work. It would be an insult to logic for me to return to work
and find a job, in the knowledge that an entire team of. MI5 agents, paid
in total many times what I would be earning, would have. the objective of
seeing me "done down" in the employment, and ejected from the place. of
work. This situation is. completely wrong and nonsensical - I would very
much. like to have a job, but MI5 are preventing me from even thinking
about returning to work. The culture of. secrecy in MI5/MI6 means there is
no objective oversight of their. expenditure, when external oversight and
greater transparency might lead to wasteful. and illogical operations such
as that. against me being shelved.
Watched and Harassed at my. Home and Accommodation
As you will. know if you have been reading these articles, MI5 have watched
and harassed me at my. home, and at every accommodation Ive had since
1990. Theyve. also watched me at neighbours houses in London, and at
short-term accommodation such. as hotels and bed-and-breakfasts. They have
used the "words" gained from these. watching activities against me, by
passing these words. on to other people such as OCTS managers for them to
make clear that I am being watched. where I live.
Harassed at rented rooms in. Oxford in 1992
This was at its worst in 1992 in Oxford, where. during the week I lived at
rented accommodation in. Oxford, and at weekends returned to my parents
home in London. I was being severely. harassed by managers at my place of
work, OCTS; and it was clear from the things they said that they. were
being supplied by MI5 with details of my home. life, that they were being
supplied. with words to repeat at me.
In 1992 I moved house in Oxford many times, living at a total of. five
rented accommodations in ten months. In January. I started off living in a
rented room at Headington near the ring road. / A40 intersection; then when
it became clear that house was being bugged, moved to. a rented room in
Botley, some. miles away. It was at the house in Botley that I had an
"interactive watching" experience with Martyn Lewis while he was. reading
the news;. I threw a term of abuse at him; he first flinched, then gave a
gsult of what I had. just said, he was no longer "on my side".
So I moved house again. This. time to a place in Cowley, near the Rover car
works, where I stayed for a few. weeks. Because of continuing harassment at
work, I soon moved. from this accommodation, to yet another rented room on
Iffley Road. By this time I was very ill and being abused continuously. at
work. Again, MI5 followed me to the rented room on. Iffley Road, and
created new instances of "newscaster. watching". There was a television in
the room which I watched, and as you can guess. the newscasters got at me
when I was watching the. television. Also once I was assaulted, if thats
the word for. what happened, on leaving the house; a youth grabbed me by
the. coat lapels, roughed me up a bit with various terms of abuse. I did
not report this. assault to the police, because what was happening to me at
work was very much worse, and nobody. seemed to think that that was worthy
of being reported to the police. Later that day at work, Alex G, a. fellow
employee, said "I. heard he was assaulted".... I had not told anyone at
work about the incident that morning..... so once again it was made. very
clear that MI5 were watching. my rented accommodation and giving
information about. what was going on there to managers at work.
So I moved house yet again in late autumn 1992,. this time to a rented room
in. a large house on Woodstock Road. I stayed there for several weeks as
the situation at work deteriorated due to OCTS managers. abuse, until I was
forced to take sick leave. from work for two months and attend hospital as
an outpatient; at which. point I gave notice on the room, and returned to
London.
MI5 continued to harass me after the. diagnosis of serious illness was
made. As reported previously, they. harassed me on a flight to Spain in
December 1992;. and in 1993, when I returned to live and work in Oxford,
they. again bugged my rooms, as well as my workplace, although the
intensity of the harassment was very much less than in. 1992.
Watched, followed. and harassed in Canada
It dismayed me to find that MI5 would. not leave me alone after I had
settled in Canada. In January 1995 I rented an apartment at. the Bayshore
complex in Ottawas west end. For some weeks there. was no sign of the
"buggers". But then it started. all over again. They first bugged my car,
which had. a car alarm installed - the alarm went off two or three times in
a single evening, and the following. day gave a signal that the car had
been broken into. Then they bugged. my apartment, and in particular they
installed bugs on the phone. line in my apartment.
In September 1995 I moved to. a new apartment in Ottawas Bytown Market
area, the. restaurant and entertainment heart of Canadas capital. This
proved a serious. mistake. In the west end I had been fairly distant from
the centre of town where MI5. concentrated their efforts at turning people
against me.. In the Market area it was much easier for the persecutors to
motivate people to harass me, and over the next. couple of years there were
frequent instances of. harassment by the general public.
From 1995 I had some Polish friends in. Ottawa, and as the reader can
guess, MI5 have spent much effort. trying to break up this friendship. They
supplied various. things about my home life to these friends, for example
where I was living in the Market, directly over the road were. the studios
of a music radio station, which you had to "look up". to see; and MI5 told
these friends that I. was "looking up" to see the radio station; so the
friends then replayed these words back to me, that I was "looking. up". MI5
have also made various sexual slanders against me, and these. friends also
unwittingly replayed some of the. words they had been imprinted with by the
MI5. persecutors.
MI5 Will Never Allow Me. to have a Normal Life
I have heard many excuses as to why MI5 continuously prevent me. from
having. a normal life. We are told that MI5 are defending the country
against a. tere to zero.
When I have. travelled abroad, they always put their people on the flights,
on the journeys I undertake, to. continue the harassment, so that I am put
off. further overseas travel, and chained to my home in London. Yet even
this is illogical, because when I. lived in Canada, they would still put
people on flights back to the UK.... and what possible reason. would they
have for doing that? Perhaps the truest. words to describe the MI5
persecution is that reason has. nothing to do with their activities - sane
people do not behave in the way the MI5. British Secret Police have been
doing.
Summer 1999 - more MI5. harassment?
In only a few days time I will. be going to Europe again. This time I have
deliberately chosen to travel by a non-UK airline; so we will see if. they
put their paid agents on this foreign carrier, we will. see if they try to
harass me on this. non-British flight.
If they do harass me on this trip to Europe,. or if they resume the
harassment in London after I. return home, then I will continue to report
their activities in these faxes. As. I said at the beginning of this
article, I would. very much like to not have to send these articles any
more, but that is not my decision to make - it is entirely up to MI5. to
cease their pointless persecution of. me, once and for all.
6275
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem
------------------------------
Date: 31 Dec 2007 10:35:42 GMT
From: fifmvimi@lycos.com
Subject: M,I`5'P ersecution ' Thre e Ye ars of MI 5 Persecutio n Fax es
Message-Id: <ne0711311035399576@4ax.com>
Three Years of "MI5 Persecution". Faxes
Ten. Thousand Faxes, and Still No Breakthrough
In the last three years I have sent at least 5,301 faxes. directly from my
computer,. and 4,478 faxes through Demons extremely useful TPC.INT service,
to politicians. and the media, in the subject of the "MI5
Persecution". This has. obviously cost me quite a lot of money, not to
mention time and effort. The aim of all this. communication has been to try
to put discussion of. the "MI5 persecution" into the public
arena; unfortunately,. this aim has not been achieved, yet.
This fax will be. my last transmission for the time being, since the summer
recess is almost upon us. Depending on what the persecutors do between. now
and the autumn, I may or may not resume faxing later this year.. In the
article dated 18/6/99 I said Id stop the articles if. MI5 left me
alone; but they seem to have no fear. of these articles, since they kept
pursuing me in Poland and after my return. to the UK. Again, if they leave
me alone this summer then I. wont have to resume the articles in the
autumn;. but I think its fairly obvious that MI5 have nothing better to do
with their time than to go after me, and its almost pointless to. make this
offer when I know they wont cease harassing. me.
TPC.INT 1996,. 1997, 1998.....
Three years ago I was living in Canada, and the only economic. way of
sending faxes to the UK. was through the international email-to-fax gateway
TPC.INT. This highly. useful and totally free service converts emails
(which. may have Postscript-formatted attachments) into faxes which it
delivers to any number within the UK. Using the. telephone book, I
constructed. a computer database of M.P.s fax numbers, and used this
database to deliver copies of the "FAQ. - frequently asked
questions" article which Id written some time. earlier.
This service. is still operational, but given that I have resided in London
for the last year, I do. not need to use Demons service when I can send
articles directly from my own computer using its fax/modem, which. is what
I have been doing since. 1998. However, instead of just sending the FAQ
article, Ive been composing articles on various aspects. of MI5s treatment
of me. Since their activities have been going on for nine years now,. and
there have been various aspects to their actions; they have harassed me. at
work, at home, through the media, etc; I have. so far not run out of things
to say,. particularly since their harassment of me is still ongoing, and I
have been able to record. the actual words used by their paid agents on my
minidisc-walkman. Since mid-March 1999 I have been sending these. articles
pretty much every. weekend.
Anyway, as mentioned above, I intend this. to be the final transmission
before the summer recess, and it. would be nice not to have to continue
these articles in the autumn. But thats something that. depends on them,
not me, and. their attitude is unfortunately clear.
Why am I sending. these articles?
Because I want. the harassment to stop. The cynical reader might think from
these articles that I "thrive on adversity" and would be lost without. the
harassment to complain about; but that is. not the case. In a perfect world
I would. like to return to work, in a job unsullied by MI5s attempts to
ruin it;. I would like to live in a house which wasnt bugged, with my words
being repeated at me wherever I go; I would like. a normal life. I do not
particularly. thrive on adversity; I am beaten down by adversity; the
purpose of these faxes is to try to. bring the whole matter out into the
public arena, where the rights and wrongs. would be visible to all, and
once that were to happen, the adversity might. cease. I have had something
approaching a normal life a couple. of times in the last nine years, but
always, in the end, MI5 turn up and ruin it.. I just want these people out
of. my life, permanently, and the only way of doing that is to kick this
business into the public arena, and shame MI5. so that they are incapable
of. doing me further damage.
Having said. that, unfortunately it seems fairly obvious by now that these
faxed articles are. not going to achieve that aim. Some of the recipients
know what. I am saying is true; but they choose to stay quiet - wisely,
because if they were to admit the truth of these articles, then they. would
bring the wrath of MI5 down. on their heads. Presumably most recipients do
not know these. articles are true; their reaction to me is the same as my
reaction to the other apparently deluded people who have. sent me email
after reading my webpage to tell me it. happened to them too; the reaction
being, "leave me alone, I dont want to know". Its sad that. many M.P.s have
given. me this reaction, because my case genuinely is different; I
genuinely am. telling the truth, and the harassment genuinely is happening
to. me, and some recipients of this fax know this to be true.
"Write to. your own M.P."
My local M.P. is Mr Keith Hill,. Labour-Streatham. He refuses to have
anything to do with me. He refuses to represent me, he refuses to talk. to
me, he has told me not to communicate. with him. He has done absolutely
nothing to. help me, and he has told me he will do absolutely nothing to
help. me.
Other M.P.s, recipients. of these faxes, have for quite some time been
telling me, "write to your own M.P.". On 23 March. 1998, Paul Burstow
M.P. wrote to me; "Whilst I. take the issues that you raise seriously,
there is a strict Parliamentary convention that one Member. of Parliament
does not take up anothers casework. Can I suggest. that you write to your
own M.P. at the House of Commons?" Hopefully. the above paragraph will
make clear that I. have written to my own M.P. and he has proved unhelpful.
Other M.P.s have told me the same thing. On 21. May 1998, John McFall
M.P. told me, ".... there is a parliamentary convention that M.P.s do not
take up cases of people not in their constituency..... therefore. can I
suggest that you write to your local. M.P. who will be better able to
assist. you." And on 8 June 1998, Michael Foster M.P. wrote to me that
"M.P.s are inundated with unsolicited faxes .... M.P.s. have a considerable
amount. of constituent work to deal with, thus other M.P.s constituents
cease to be of concern in so far as they should have a voice. and
representation".
Simon Hughes M.P. wrote to me on 5 November 1998, "There. is a strict
parliamentary convention which states that I. am not able to represent
individuals who are not constituents of mine. My advice. is that you find
out who. your own Member of Parliament is rather than circulating your
story to all M.P.s.". To my suggestion. that Keith Hill M.P. was doing
nothing to help me, George Foulkes M.P. sent the following. faxed
response;. "If Keith Hill your own M.P. cannot help no-one else in the
House of Commons can." But it is clearly not a. case of "cannot" help, but
"will not" help. I have detailed in letters to Mr Hill specific ways. in
which he could help me, first of. all by finding a lawyer to represent
me. It is Mr Hills job as a Member of Parliament to represent. his
constituents;. if he chooses not to do so, then it reflects badly on him.
Kate Hoey Sympathises, but. says, "Write to your own M.P."
Here is. part of a letter Ms Hoey sent to me on 15 June 1999.
I appreciate that you have concerns about the persecution. and harassment
that you feel you are experiencing but I. note that your MP is in fact
Keith Hill. There is. a very strict Parliamentary code which means that
M.P.s can only take action on matters that relate to. their own
constituents. I am. aware that you are not happy with the fact that you do
not feel Mr Hill. will assist you but I am afraid that I cannot take any
action on your. behalf.
Ms Hoey plainly belongs. in the camp of people who do not know about the
reality of the "MI5 Persecution".. She doubts its existence; "the
harassment you feel you are experiencing".. She urges me to see Mr Hills
assistance, as have. other M.P.s detailed above.
Really, the fact that. I am unable to obtain assistance from any other
M.P., if my own alleged "representative" Mr Hill chooses. not to represent
me, is a very basic weakness in the Parliamentary system.. Beinggmainly
events at my former employers in Oxford during 1992, when I. was harassed
constantly by manager Steve Mitchell for most of. 1992, and was forced to
begin attending hospital as an outpatient as. a result. This harassment was
obviously of Mitchells own volition, since. I observed him harass similarly
another new worker two years later; but. it was also at MI5s instigation,
since they kept providing him with words from my home life which he. then
proceeded to abuse me with. Yet this is not the. only employment that MI5
have destroyed; the MI5 persecution has lasted from the end. of my student
days until the present time, during which. I have had three jobs, all of
which have been in. various ways destroyed by MI5s deliberate actions.
In March 1999 I decided to try to force the issue once and for all.. Ever
weekend for the last four months, apart. from two weeks when I was on
holiday, I have. sent original articles by fax directly from my computer to
Westminster politicians. Here is a summary of the articles of. the last
four. months;
How to. Identify the Persecutors
Their use of Schizophrenia to discredit. my claims
Comparing the. MI5 Persecution with German "Final Solution"
MI5. are Plainly Trying to Kill Me
MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless. Hate-Campaign
Four Years of. "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups
MI5 Agents are Clinical. Psychopaths
BBC. Newscasters Lior the Victims of MI5
MI5 Have Systematically Destroyed. My Life
Harassment through. the Radio
To my deep worry these fourteen faxed articles. have still not achieved the
objective. of kicking the matter out into the public arena and forcing an
admission either from the persecutors, or. from those "in the know", which
includes. some M.P.s.
I dont really know what else to do to try to bring. the "MI5
persecution" out into the open. I would have expected. that these weekly
faxed articles would have had some. effect, but the only result has been
M.P.s telling me to contact my own. representative Mr Hill who refuses to
talk to me. I understand the convention that. M.P.s deal with their own
constituents and not those of other M.P.s, but there seems to. be a gap in
the process since it allows your own M.P.. to refuse to deal with you, and
then you are. totally denied any representation at all.
Conclusion
The only conclusion I. can inform the readership of these articles of, is
that there is. no conclusion to this matter, yet! Three years of
intermittent articles, and four. months of faxes every weekend, have been
absorbed by some of the. most powerful people in the country, to no effect.
Whether. these articles continue in the Autumn is entirely up to the
"opposition". I offered them a cessation of complaints if they. would leave
me alone. on holiday in June/July, and they went right ahead and harassed
me anyway, on holiday. and after I returned to London. If MI5 cease their
activities now, then I wont have to continue these. faxes in the
autumn; but I suspect they. wont cease, which means youre in for more
articles later. this year. "There will be no conclusion."
9599
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V11 Issue 1161
***************************************
