[3514] in SIPB_Linux_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Some concerns with the SIPB redhat installer

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Mon Jun 18 09:54:22 2001

Message-Id: <200106181354.JAA22847@egyptian-gods.MIT.EDU>
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
cc: linux-dev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:31:30 EDT."
             <200106180331.XAA25875@multics.mit.edu> 
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:54:09 -0400
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>

> Is it not possible to just hack the installer to verify that the
> linux partition is early enough and punt otherwise, so you don't
> leave the user with a disk that won't boot usefully?

I have a machine next to me which has a Linux partition past the 8GB
mark (starts about 50GB in, if I remember right), and it boots just
fine.  Ironically, I had to fight with the Red Hat 7.1 installer to
make this happen, because the installer incorrectly decided that my
machine's BIOS didn't have the necessary feature.  I don't know how it
decided that.  (Specifically, Disk Druid simply refused to create a
boot partition past the 8GB mark, so I had to run fdisk by hand, and
then it gave me a warning at some point but let me proceed.)

So, two observations: (a) the naive fix for this problem is
unnecessarily limiting for some users, and (b) SIPB will get a less
naive fix for this problem simply by moving to Red Hat 7.1, although
that fix seems to still be too conservative.

I agree that simply yielding an unbootable machine, with no
diagnostic, is pretty sad.

I think the Red Hat 7.1 installer also has some automatic partitioning
support (when it doesn't fail like I mentioned above), but I don't
remember clearly.  It would almost certainly have to be hacked up to
make an AFS cache partition to be useful for the SIPB installer, of
course.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post