[479] in Project_DB
Re: CG Director Comments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Ferrara)
Thu Jun 3 16:11:30 1999
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990603160841.00984dc0@hesiod>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 16:08:41 -0400
To: Mike Barker <mbarker@mit.edu>, project-db@mit.edu
From: Robert Ferrara <rferrara@MIT.EDU>
Cc: miki@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990603152550.00c546c0@po11.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mike,
I think you're right about adding new Processes/Performing Organizations
(#1) and adding all the Directors and Dani (#3). BTW, I also mentioned the
target 6/18 rollout at today's ITLT.
Cheers, Bob
Mike Barker wrote:
>I spent a little time with Allison this afternoon. In using the Project DB,
>she has a few comments:
>
>1. We should add CG and ABST somewhere. Given the simple model, probably
>these belong in "processes".
>
>2. adolan needs to be added to the directors list.
>
>3. while there seems to be a process directors list, there doesn't seem to
>be a practice directors list. However, business practice directors
>certainly do have projects that they are running/sponsoring. Should
>(tregan, vkumar, dennis) be added -- maybe to the directors list (and quit
>calling it a process directors list, just call it a directors list?)
>
>4. Processes and Practices should be capitalized -- especially since people
>keep talking about "small-p" and "big-p" processes.
>
>5. She tried making a project "formal" to move it from the "informal
>projects" section to the project summary. Nothing happened, as I think the
>move depends on process and/or practice. This is counter-intuitive.
>
>mike
>
>
>
