[236] in libertarians

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

A Call to Arms

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Arnone)
Fri Sep 23 21:25:40 1994

From: mule@netcom.com (Miles Arnone)
To: objectivism@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 18:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: libertarians@MIT.EDU

To those who are rational:

I recently read Alperovitz's article, "Distributing Our Technological 
Inheritance" in the October issue of Technology Review.  Never in my life 
have I read such an affront to reason.  Mr. Alperovitz would strip all 
individuals of the products of their work and deliver it to the mob.  He 
calls for the end of property rights, our "irrational economic system", 
and the distribution of a "collective" technological inheritance to each 
and every human being.  Mr. Alperovitz makes Toohey of The Fountainhead 
look like a good person!

Cutting to the quick, I think you will each find it in your best interest 
to read this article and respond to it.  I for one am very concerned to 
see these views promoted in any publication, let alone an MIT magazine.  
For those who read the article and are so moved, I urge you to send your 
responses to "technology-review-letters@mit.edu".  Following are some 
excerpts from this article....

"Very little of what we as a society produce today can be said to derive 
from the work, risk and imagination of citizens now living"
Mr. Alperovitz builds a model that presents our time as one of 
stagnation, where all that is to be invented has been, and where 
significant achievement is no longer possible.  He sounds like the now 
infamous director of the patent office who claimed over 100 years ago 
that there was nothing significant left to be invented!  The flaw in his 
model is that he sees only a determinant, single-threaded developemnt of 
technology with predictable progress and ends.  History rebukes this 
argument, as does the rapid development of new technologies today.  In 
fact, the growth of trade and industry world-wide (which Alperovitz hopes 
to harness) could not exist if we were, "akin to a pebble resting on a 
mountain of previous achievement..."

Alperovitz: "...then a substantial portion of society's current income 
should go as a matter of equal right to each individual, apart from the 
amount he or she earns from current work or risk or to the entire community."

"Plainly put, the way we allocate the benefits of present and past 
economic activity that stem from this technological inheritance is 
irrational and unjust."  His essential conclusion, here presented, 
involves several leaps in logic, from the fact that because there have 
been past acheivements we must all own them, to the assertion that these 
benefits can continue to be reaped for a common good in a society where 
the individual means nothing.  Someone should tell Mr. Alperovitz about 
the 20th Century Motor Company!

Heard enough?  Let's rally against this evil!  Send your responses to the 
Technology Review!  I for one am going to send Mr. Alperovitz a copy of 
Atlas Shrugged!

					Miles Arnone
					MIT '91

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post