[16991] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: : Why are we using libverto again
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathaniel McCallum)
Thu Jul 7 12:52:48 2011
From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:52:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1310052934.16598.15.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <1310057562.16598.18.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>,
"krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:35 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> Simo, I agree with everything you said, with one correction below...
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:26 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Windows was not stated as a necessary dependency when the project was
> > started. If it is now I am sure we can add it on the roadmap. The only
> > issue is that I know of no event libraries available in Windows at all
> > unless you count stuff that compiles on cygwyn/mingw which you said is
> > not ok.
>
> glib is available on win32 and libverto will be available shortly via
> mingw32. I am taking careful attention to make sure that this will
> compile in MSVC++ as well (though as I don't have MSVC++ right now I
> can't guarantee it of course).
>
> Nathaniel
I've committed a win32 port. It is untested but compiles. That being
said, most of the code is from my previous experience with LoadLibrary()
on win32, so it should mostly work.
Nathaniel
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
