[16990] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: RFC: libverto nearing release
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathaniel McCallum)
Thu Jul 7 12:21:27 2011
From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
To: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:21:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4E15DA09.8020502@secure-endpoints.com>
Message-ID: <1310055683.16598.16.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 12:08 -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> On 7/7/2011 11:43 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> >> In short, I'm not super worried about a win32 port. At best, I think it
> >> will change some of the internal semantics. I'm mostly focused now on
> >> getting it to build/work on non-linux.
> >
> > I think you should worry about Windows. Also, dladdr() is present in
> > Linux and Solaris, so it's really the BSDs you should worry about.
>
> Relying on a loose bundle of DLLs to represent pluggable modules is no
> longer the preferred mechanism on Windows. Instead, modules should be
> packaged and distributed as signed side-by-side assemblies. The
> assemblies can be loaded at run-time via a manifest.
>
> The existing KFW libraries have significant issues when linked to IIS
> modules partly because it is impossible to ensure that all IIS modules
> have the same KFW version as dependencies.
Patches welcome. ;)
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
