[16992] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: : Why are we using libverto again
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Thu Jul 7 13:36:47 2011
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsltyay40c8.fsf_-_@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:36:42 -0400
Message-ID: <1310060202.2694.67.camel@t410>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 10:44 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Now, for the KDC today, we could just use a specific event library and
> gain significant complexity savings.
The reason I favor an intermediary is that the event loop will be part
of the API for kdcpreauth plugins (and probably KDB and authdata plugins
in the future). Picking an event loop now carries costs not just for a
future libkdc but also a plugin interface transition cost.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
