|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: schoff@psi.com Cc: matsb@sics.se, "Craig Partridge" <craig@aland.bbn.com>, com-priv@psi.com In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 10 Dec 91 20:56:22 -0400. Date: Wed, 11 Dec 91 09:52:36 +0100 From: matsb@sics.se Marty wrote: Two systems is not necessarily bad - technically - psi has had almost flawless access to cerfnet and alternet sites through the CIX, the same would not be said of "nsfnet only" organizations. Fine, I sence that this is what NSF, FARNET et c is trying to promote. What I fear is that is the jungle of routing policy restrictions we will loose connectivity, and add complexity to such an extent that services may be hampered. Lets hope for the best... Bear in mind, this is the US part of it, "our" end also have, or will have a similiar "matrix", interconnecting these, with multiple paths and policys, will be - interesting... Lets hope policy restrictions does not prevent the network service (to much). --mats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |