[12217] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Arizona Lawyers Form Company..."

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russell Nelson)
Tue May 10 01:34:09 1994

Date: Mon, 9 May 94 22:20 EDT
From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
To: tenney@netcom.com
Cc: raisch@internet.com, com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199405091728.KAA19698@netcom.com> (tenney@netcom.com)

   Date: Mon, 9 May 1994 10:29:05 -0800
   From: tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney)

   At  6:27 AM 5/9/94 -0700, Rob Raisch, The Internet Company wrote:
   >Glenn, every CIX member has an AUP which dictates what traffic they will
   >or will not carry.  NEARnet, for their members at least, will refuse to
   >carry you if you mail unsolicited adverts.  Can it be far in the future
   >where that becomes inward as well as outward?

   My point was:  What happens if C&S pay the $10,000 to become a CIX *MEMBER*
   themselves?

Nothing.  They've wasted their money.  Every end site will put a C&S
filter on their servers.  Simple change to inetd (and probably smtpd
aka sendmail).  Somewhat less efficient than central filtering, but
more democratic.

C&S are trying to use other people's property without their
permission.  There's no combination of tricks C&S could use to get
around that.  The only reason they currently can is because no one has
been enough of a jerk to try before.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>      ftp.msen.com:pub/vendor/crynwr/crynwr.wav
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | ask4 PGP key
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 (9201 FAX)    | Quakers do it in the light
Potsdam, NY 13676 | LPF member - ask me about the harm software patents do.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post