[284] in ad-lib
Serials holdings
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Wed Apr 5 09:26:26 1995
To: gyoung@MIT.EDU
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 09:25:56 EDT
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>
#10290734 is the record that Stephanie cited where it appeared that
the serials holdings were created from the 949 and all of the
maintenance work that serials was doing in the 930 appeared to have
been lost.
(Grant, you'll probably be getting a trouble sheet on this since
Stephanie was planning to prepare one.)
We haven't formally discussed CAT-SIMPLE or CAT-DETAILED displays
in our ad-cat meetings, but, we'll add them to our ever-expanding 'to
do' list.
--Sarah
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 95 08:30 EDT
From: m.ridgeway%34@gem.geac.com
To: smitchel@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: SERIAL HOLDINGS
Please copy this to Grant.
I looked at 10290734's MARC display and it looked ok. The 949 was picked
up for item processing but the 930/866 data is there. As stated earlier,
949 processing in the test was inadvertant and will not be done in final.
Grant, please add or have Sam add, 866 tag to the CAT-SIMPLE and
CAT-DETAILED displays. Perhaps this is where confusion originated? Or
is there still something wrong with 10290734?
- --
Michel Ridgeway, Project Manager, Libraries m.ridgeway@geac.com
923 West King Road, Malvern, PA 19355
voice (610) 644-4071 fax (610) 644-0907
------- End of Forwarded Message