[417] in Privacy_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[ PRIVACY Forum ] U.S. Group Wants Total Driving Cell Phone Ban -- Or

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (privacy@vortex.com)
Sun Jan 11 23:45:02 2009

Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:27:54 -0800
To: privacy-list@vortex.com
Message-ID: <20090112042754.GA15880@vortex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
From: privacy@vortex.com
Reply-To: PRIVACY Forum Digest mailing list <privacy@vortex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: privacy-bounces+privacy-forum=mit.edu@vortex.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



               U.S. Group Wants Total Driving Cell Phone Ban 
                                 -- Or -- 
                    "Are you talking to yourself again?"

                http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000492.html


Greetings.  The U.S. National Safety Council wants to ban all cell
phone use when driving, both hands-free and hand-held 
( http://uk.reuters.com/article/marketsNewsUS/idUKN1129237820090112 ).

Now, from a technical standpoint this does make more sense than
banning only the use of hand-held cell phones when driving, since
study after study shows that hands-free is just as distracting 
( http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000396.html ).

However, I question whether the U.S. has the political will for such a
total ban on cell phone use by drivers, and I also set forth the
following query ...

When viewing someone in another vehicle, assuming no visible flashing
lights in their ears and such, how can you tell the difference between
someone talking on a hands-free cell phone vs. someone talking to
themselves?  Would police be issued specialized gear to detect cell
phone signals?  Just how would such a ban be managed from a practical
standpoint?

Of course, the answer is that it would *not* be practical.  The
solution is not to concentrate on cell phone use, but rather on actual
*distracted driving* in its various forms -- including when
caused by eating, putting on makeup, tuning the radio, playing with
the other hi-tech gadgets on the car console, yelling at the kids in
the back seat, being visually diverted by the under-clad body waiting
at the crosswalk, or ...

The distracted driving itself is what really counts, not the
innumerable possible actions that we take while driving with the
*potential* to distract us.

It's time to bring some sense back into this debate, not more nonsense.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@vortex.com or lauren@pfir.org 
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren 
Co-Founder, PFIR
   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org 
Co-Founder, NNSquad 
   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com 
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com 

_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
http://lists.vortex.com/mailman/listinfo/privacy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post