[820] in UA Senate
Re: athena printing committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Chang)
Sat Oct 16 09:20:51 2010
Cc: Betsy Riley <rileyb@mit.edu>, Daniel D Hawkins <hwkns@mit.edu>,
Richard A Dahan <rdahan@mit.edu>,
"ua-senate@mit.edu" <ua-senate@mit.edu>
From: David Chang <dchang@MIT.EDU>
To: Michael E Plasmeier <theplaz@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <60826A506BCDE447B39C85C1496EAB74018B110531@EXPO7.exchange.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:20:46 -0400
Completely tangential to the issue at hand. Just wanted to comment and
encourage you to pursue some of the remaining ideas.
> -2,000 page/semester quota to limit the top ~5% of printers,
> CopyTech course readers included - think they are going to do this,
> CopyTech part questionable
The copytech part would be really cool. That way I don't need to pay
$15 to copy tech and there is no incentive for me to be printing 200
pages on a normal laser printer when I can get a bound one for the
same (or even 1.2 pages per) cost. This might be possible if you
remind them that us printing books in a cluster costs them more then
if we had copytech do it.
> Hawkins, Richard, and I had proposed closing the disused clusters
> 38-370, 37-332, 4-166, 2-225, 2-032 and replace them with nearby
> quickstations with printers.
Snaps (Especially if they were all on the first floor where there is
more traffic so more students know about it.)
> In addition, MIT should move all of the book out of Barker 5th
> floor and lock up the books on Hayden 1st floor and open those
> spaces 24/7 with a bump in computers and group study rooms. Barker,
> Hayden, and 5th Floor Student Center would become integrated study
> neighborhoods with a mix of computers, individual study, and group
> study. The committee has not shown any momentum in moving forward
> with anything. What do you think is a better option? Status quo or
> what we proposed?
**Snaps Snaps** A good first step might be just Barker, which seems
logistically easier to lock down and perhaps more palatable for MIT
Libraries. I'm not exactly sure that there is demand for two 24/7
study areas, especially that it's across the road for many students.
If there is demand, then proceed with Hayden.
dc
On Oct 16, 2010, at 12:43 AM, Michael E Plasmeier wrote:
> Hi Betsy and the UA Senate,
>
> I am the UA rep on the Institute's Athena and Printing Committee. I
> worked extensively on the printing issue along with Daniel Hawkins
> and Richard Dahan in CSL on this issue last year. We did a lot of
> work and thinking on this issue. We conducted a survey and talked
> for weeks about what the best options would be. We put together our
> suggestions into an 11 page report and PowerPoint presentation.
> Because we completed our work at the end of the year, without time
> for Senate approval, and because the Committee was on the same page
> with the UA, and decided to implement our printing suggestions this
> past summer anyway, we did not publish our report. Many of our
> recommendations are already complete.
>
> Outline of printing recommendations:
> -buy new printers - Complete
> -unify model for Athena and dorm printing support - Complete
> -Pharos printing system - last I heard the Institute was going to do
> this
> -2,000 page/semester quota to limit the top ~5% of printers,
> CopyTech course readers included - think they are going to do this,
> CopyTech part questionable
>
> The Institute Committee, which Oliver de facto leads, has not met
> this year. I've sent the committee an email asking if there were
> any open issues they wished to reconvene on. The remaining issue
> that is open under our charter is a reconfiguration of the Athena
> spaces. Hawkins, Richard, and I had proposed closing the disused
> clusters 38-370, 37-332, 4-166, 2-225, 2-032 and replace them with
> nearby quickstations with printers. In addition, MIT should move
> all of the book out of Barker 5th floor and lock up the books on
> Hayden 1st floor and open those spaces 24/7 with a bump in computers
> and group study rooms. Barker, Hayden, and 5th Floor Student Center
> would become integrated study neighborhoods with a mix of computers,
> individual study, and group study. The committee has not shown any
> momentum in moving forward with anything. What do you think is a
> better option? Status quo or what we proposed?
>
> In any case I think any work on this issue can be handled inside of
> CSL, as it has been. I extend an invitation to Betsy and whoever
> else wishes to join me on the issue to work with me inside of the
> existing framework. Also, as for moving forward with the Institute
> committee: if the consensus is that status quo is better, we can
> leave sleeping dragons lying, but if people actual prefer the 24/7
> library space, I can push that issue if need be. I welcome feedback.
>
> -Michael Plasmeier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Betsy Riley [mailto:rileyb@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:38 PM
> To: ua-senate@mit.edu
> Subject: athena printing committee
>
> Hello -
>
> As I said I would, I have written a bill to create an ad hoc
> committee to examine changes to Athena printing, provide a mechanism
> for student input about printing, and ensure that student ideas are
> implemented or at least appropriately considered. Let me know what
> you think, if you think anything should be changed, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Betsy
>
> <Tooling and Printing in 2010 to Senate.pptx>
