|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:22:43 -0400 From: Alex Dehnert <adehnert@MIT.EDU> To: Paul Baranay <pbaranay@mit.edu> CC: Ted Hilk <thilk@mit.edu>, UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <71c951390910192316y1ade0407i3bc566a521480d86@mail.gmail.com> Paul Baranay wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Alex Dehnert <adehnert@mit.edu> wrote: > >> <snip> >> >> I guess at this point the bill is technically no longer mine, so I hope >> that next week Paul will permit me to propose a series of amendments in >> rapid succession. > > > That sounds fairly reasonable; I'd probably prefer if the amendments are > broken up into self-contained logical chunks. Yup. One of the virtues of a git repo is that I'm doing one commit per change, so I should be able to just go through the history commit by commit... ~~Alex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |