[164] in UA Senate

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 41UAS2.3: Bill to Authorize the Treasurer to Reallocate Money to Student Groups

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexandra Jordan)
Mon Oct 19 22:25:27 2009

Cc: Ted Hilk <thilk@mit.edu>, Alex Dehnert <adehnert@mit.edu>,
        UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu>
From: Alexandra Jordan <amjordan@MIT.EDU>
To: Paul Youchak <youchakp@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4ADD1DBA.7010002@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:25:09 -0400

Response to Paul:

I agree that committees could find that a project can't be =20
implemented, or that they no longer want to implement it, but since =20
Senate budgeted money for said project, Senate should be informed and =20=

able to approve the reallocation of these funds. I don't want to take =20=

the right of Committee Chairs to use their discretion on projects, but =20=

rather I don't want to formally exclude Senate from deciding to change =20=

project funding.

I'm not worried about the Treasurer unilaterally changing committee =20
budgets mid-semester. I'm worried about putting a piece of legislation =20=

in place that practically guarantees that next year's chairs will have =20=

a precedent of lower budgets and will thus have to work much harder to =20=

ask for increased allocations.  As I said before, Senate usually =20
relies on precedent when approving allocations, so this would almost =20
ensure a more difficult budget approval for many committees.

Alex


On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Paul Youchak wrote:

> I am responding to both Alex and Ted here...
>
> Committees may fund for a project and later find out is is either =20
> not possible or not desirable.  Committees may think a project is a =20=

> good idea but they will not really know, for whatever reason, that =20
> their idea should be implemented until they have tried.  Committee's =20=

> can make mistakes about what they want to do in the upcoming =20
> semester, especially since they are budgeted for so far in advance.  =20=

> If a committee cannot fulfill their obligation for the project then =20=

> it is acceptable to remove the line.  In my mind there are not =20
> separate issues.
>
> Having the reallocation of money be reversible makes no sense.  The =20=

> committee leader should not release the money unless they are 100% =20
> sure they wont need it.  Secondly, if they find they have changed =20
> their mind it is always possible to ask for more money from =20
> discretionary.  I don't think this will ever happen, so its not a =20
> very strong objection to the bill.
>
> The treasurer does by no means have the right to reduce a committees =20=

> budget mid semester.  If you are afraid of the committee being =20
> overruled by the committee chair then we can say the committee must =20=

> unanimously (2/3, whatever) approve of the reallocation of funds.  I =20=

> however, think you are more concerned with the power in the =20
> treasurer.  Remember, the Senate still has ultimate control because =20=

> we do now have the right reverse his decision.
>
> Note, this bill will only last for this year unless we decide to =20
> renew it.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Ted Hilk wrote:
>>
>>    That the Treasurer may reallocate funds from one part of the UA
>>    budget to the pool of funds that
>>    the Finance Board helps allocate to student groups for the next
>>    funding period;
>>
>>
>> Regarding this pool: if the applicable committee chair later =20
>> decides that this decision was made in error, is there any way for =20=

>> it to be reversed?  Given that the money is allocated to a "pool of =20=

>> funds" rather than directly to the groups (hence implying some time =20=

>> delay before the money is actually out of UA's control), shouldn't =20=

>> such reversal be an option?  If not, why not?
>>
>>    That such reallocations must be approved by the committee chair or
>>    other officer in charge of the
>>    budget area losing said funds;
>>
>>
>> Would it be possible to clarify, in the text of the bill, which =20
>> specific positions are allowed to do this for which specific budget =20=

>> areas?  I feel that the existing wording is a bit vague, given the =20=

>> powers involved.
>>
>>    That the Senate, Finance Board, and [a]affected Chair must be
>>    informed of each such reallocation;
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason why this line does not say "by the next meeting =20
>> of the Senate"?  While understanding the importance of delegation, =20=

>> I believe that timely information is necessary to allow for review =20=

>> of the decisions.
>>
>> Finally, I would like to note that I'm not by any means opposed to =20=

>> the principle of this bill.  I agree that leftover money from our =20
>> operations should go to student groups.  I just want to make sure =20
>> that Senate exercises caution in doing so, and more time for =20
>> discussion was necessary to meet this aim.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ted Hilk
>> EC Senator
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Alex Dehnert <adehnert@mit.edu =
<mailto:adehnert@mit.edu=20
>> >> wrote:
>>
>>    Since we postponed this a week...
>>
>>    If you have questions: Please ask them explicitly. Otherwise, no
>>    guarantee that you'll get an answer... I'm not psychic.
>>
>>    I'll probably put together some more information shortly, but I
>>    encourage some discussion to happen here besides that.
>>
>>    ~~Alex
>>
>>
>>    Alex Dehnert wrote:
>>
>>        I wrote a bill which is available at
>>        =
http://web.mit.edu/ua/senate/UAS41/2/moving-money/moving-money.pdf=20
>> .
>>
>>        The bill authorizes the treasurer to:
>>        * reallocate funds from a committee to the pool of funds that
>>        the Finance Board helps allocate to student groups for the
>>        next funding period; and
>>        * Requires that such reallocations be approved by the
>>        committee chair losing said funds; and
>>        * That the Senate, Finance Board, and affected Chair must be
>>        informed of each such reallocation; and
>>        * That such authorization shall expire at the end of the
>>        2009=962010 fiscal year unless renewed by Senate.
>>
>>        I'm happy to answer any questions that you have. It would be
>>        awesome if we can get most questions out *before* Senate, so
>>        that Senate can be short without being much less effective.
>>
>>        ~~Alex
>>
>>
>>

__________________________________
Alexandra Jordan

MIT 2011
Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Science
Political Science

amjordan@mit.edu
916.813.7740





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post