[99712] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Creating demand for IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Wed Oct 3 00:21:58 2007
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: 03 Oct 2007 03:57:19 +0000
In-Reply-To: <918D3B52-A120-4E4D-90EB-65842E16B3EF@virtualized.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
drc@virtualized.org (David Conrad) writes:
> ... You cannot simply wave a magic wand and say "there shall be no NAT". ...
actually, you can. see RFC 4966. don't be fooled by the title, it's not just
damning NAT-PT, since it justifies doing so by stating that NAT is damned.
(of course, waving a magic wand and saying something doesn't make it so.)
--
Paul Vixie
